United States v. Hopkins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hopkins

88 F. App'x 647

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hopkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 F. App'x 665 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2004·No. 03-7588·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Edward Hopkins, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction of his sentence. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hopkins v. United States, No. CR-97-9-2-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2003 & Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willie Edward Hopkins, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction of his sentence. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hopkins v. United States, No. CR-97-9-2-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2003 & Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Hopkins, 88 F. App'x 647 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

88 F. App'x 647 (United States v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.