United States v. Hopkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7798
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SEAN JERVITT HOPKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:99-cr-00224)
Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Jervitt Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada, Assistant United States Attorney, Ronald Jay Tenpas, James Marton Trusty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sean Jervitt Hopkins appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for production of transcripts at government
expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Hopkins (United States v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.