United States v. Hopkins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hopkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 F. App'x 235
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2007·No. 06-7798·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SEAN JERVITT HOPKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:99-cr-00224)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Jervitt Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada, Assistant United States Attorney, Ronald Jay Tenpas, James Marton Trusty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sean Jervitt Hopkins appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for production of transcripts at government

expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hopkins, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Hopkins (United States v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.