United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar
This text of 966 F.2d 1277 (United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
966 F.2d 1277
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel PROA-TOVAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-50373.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 13, 1992.
Prior Report: 945 F.2d 1450
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
966 F.2d 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-proa-tovar-ca9-1992.