United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar

966 F.2d 1277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar. Read the opinion of the Court — 975 F.2d 592
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 13, 1992·No. 90-50373·Published

Opinion

966 F.2d 1277

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel PROA-TOVAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-50373.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 13, 1992.

Prior Report: 945 F.2d 1450

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar, 966 F.2d 1277 (9th Cir. 1992).

966 F.2d 1277 (United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Daniel Proa-Tovar
945 F.2d 1450 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)