United States v. Blake
This text of United States v. Blake (United States v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7104
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WARREN ANDREW BLAKE, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00124-jct-1)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fay Frances Spence, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Warren Andrew Blake, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United
States v. Blake, No. 7:04-cr-00124-jct-1 (W.D. Va. June 25,
2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).
We deny Blake’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Blake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blake-ca4-2009.