United States v. Blake

326 F. App'x 186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Blake. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 F.3d 331
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2009·No. No. 08-7104·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Andrew Blake, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Blake, No. 7:04-cr-00124-jct-1 (W.D.Va. June 25, 2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny Blake’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blake, 326 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2009).

326 F. App'x 186 (United States v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hood
556 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)