FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER D—IMPRISONMENT

Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment

18 U.S.C. § 3582
Title18Crimes and Criminal Procedure
ChapterSUBCHAPTER D—IMPRISONMENT

This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3582.

Text

(a)Factors To Be Considered in Imposing a Term of Imprisonment.—The court, in determining whether to impose a term of imprisonment, and, if a term of imprisonment is to be imposed, in determining the length of the term, shall consider the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, recognizing that imprisonment is not an appropriate means of promoting correction and rehabilitation. In determining whether to make a recommendation concerning the type of prison facility appropriate for the defendant, the court shall consider any pertinent policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a)(2).
(b)Effect of Finality of Judgment.—Notwithstanding the fact that a sentence to imprisonment can subsequently be—
(1)modified pursuant t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kris Koglin
822 F.3d 984 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
9 case citations
United States v. Rick Contreras
820 F.3d 773 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
8 case citations
United States v. Derry
824 F.3d 299 (Second Circuit, 2016)
5 case citations
United States v. Jose Aguilar, Jr.
633 F. App'x 471 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Joe Daniels
633 F. App'x 468 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Jeremy Turner
633 F. App'x 495 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Genaro Gasca
633 F. App'x 470 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. David Derryberry
642 F. App'x 788 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Jermaine Jones
641 F. App'x 280 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Christopher Hayes
641 F. App'x 288 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Kendrick Hester
641 F. App'x 295 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Stanley Bolden
646 F. App'x 726 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Antonio Owens
641 F. App'x 291 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Alvin Johnson
641 F. App'x 280 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Locke
644 F. App'x 815 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Clifton Rivers
644 F. App'x 323 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Rafael Solomon
643 F. App'x 251 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Larry Williams
642 F. App'x 283 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Andre Routt
642 F. App'x 438 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Robert Troy Altman
647 F. App'x 914 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1998; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7107, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4418; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3588, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4930; Pub. L. 103–322, title VII, §70002, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1984; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §604(b)(3), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3506; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, §3006, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1806; Pub. L. 115–391, title VI, §603(b), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5239.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, referred to in subsec. (e), is Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1236, which is classified principally to chapter 13 (§801 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of Title 21 and Tables.

Amendments
2018—Subsec. (c)(1)(A). Pub. L. 115–391, §603(b)(1), in introductory provisions, inserted "or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier," after "Bureau of Prisons,".
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 115–391, §603(b)(2), (3), added subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e).
2002—Subsec. (c)(1)(A). Pub. L. 107–273 inserted "(and may impose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment)" after "may reduce the term of imprisonment" in introductory provisions.
1996—Subsec. (c)(1)(A)(i). Pub. L. 104–294 inserted "or" after semicolon at end.
1994—Subsec. (c)(1)(A). Pub. L. 103–322, inserted a dash after "if it finds that", designated "extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction" as cl. (i), inserted a semicolon at end of cl. (i), realigned margins accordingly, and added cl. (ii) before concluding provisions.
1990—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 101–647 inserted "of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure" after "rule 35".
1988—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 100–690 substituted "994(o)" for "994(n)".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–294 effective Sept. 13, 1994, see section 604(d) of Pub. L. 104–294, set out as a note under section 13 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3582.