United States v. Blake

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WARREN ANDREW BLAKE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00124-jct-1)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fay Frances Spence, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Warren Andrew Blake, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United

States v. Blake, No. 7:04-cr-00124-jct-1 (W.D. Va. June 25,

2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).

We deny Blake’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED