Home/Ninth Circuit/UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant

168 F.3d 1141, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1655, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1312, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643, 1999 WL 79668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 1999
Docket97-10331
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 168 F.3d 1141 (UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant, 168 F.3d 1141, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1655, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1312, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643, 1999 WL 79668 (9th Cir. 1999).

Opinions

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.

An active judge requested, sua sponte, a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellee’s petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliot-Park v. Manglona
592 F.3d 1003 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Ae Elliot-Park v. Jarrod Manglona
Ninth Circuit, 2010
United States v. Burdeau
180 F.3d 1091 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant
168 F.3d 1141 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 F.3d 1141, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1655, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1312, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643, 1999 WL 79668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-plaintiff-appellee-v-allan-a-mussari-ca9-1999.