UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant
168 F.3d 1141, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1655, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1312, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643, 1999 WL 79668
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 22, 1999·No. 97-10331·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
An active judge requested, sua sponte, a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Appellee’s petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant, 168 F.3d 1141, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1655, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1312, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2643, 1999 WL 79668 (9th Cir. 1999).
168 F.3d 1141 (UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elliot-Park v. Manglona
592 F.3d 1003 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Ae Elliot-Park v. Jarrod Manglona
Ninth Circuit, 2010
United States v. Burdeau
180 F.3d 1091 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan A. MUSSARI, Defendant-Appellant
168 F.3d 1141 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)