United States v. Burdeau

180 F.3d 1091, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5071, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6561, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 25, 1999
DocketNo. 97-30388
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 180 F.3d 1091 (United States v. Burdeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burdeau, 180 F.3d 1091, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5071, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6561, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974 (9th Cir. 1999).

Opinions

ORDER; Concurrence by Judge TASIMA; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing.

A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the sua sponte en banc call is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 F.3d 1091, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5071, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6561, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burdeau-ca9-1999.