Home/Ninth Circuit/United States v. Burdeau

United States v. Burdeau

180 F.3d 1091, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5071, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6561, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 25, 1999·No. No. 97-30388·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

ORDER; Concurrence by Judge TASIMA; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing.

A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the sua sponte en banc call is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Burdeau, 180 F.3d 1091, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5071, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6561, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974 (9th Cir. 1999).

180 F.3d 1091 (United States v. Burdeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newdow v. U.S. Congress
328 F.3d 466 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
291 F.3d 1062 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States of America, and Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company, a Corporation, and Nevada State Engineer Rambling River Ranches, Inc., United States of America v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company, a Corporation, and Rambling River Ranches, Inc., Larry Fritz Gaylord Blue Equity Trust, Applicants-Appellees. United States of America, Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians, Intervenor-Appellee v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Company, a Corporation, and Rambling River Ranches, Inc., Larry Fritz Gaylord Blue Equity Trust Herbert Lohse, Applicants-Appellees
291 F.3d 1062 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Scot L. Zimmerman v. State of Oregon Department of Justice
183 F.3d 1161 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)