United States v. Burdeau
This text of 180 F.3d 1091 (United States v. Burdeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER; Concurrence by Judge TASIMA; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing.
A sua sponte call for a vote on rehearing this case en banc was made by an active judge of this court. The call failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the sua sponte en banc call is rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 F.3d 1091, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5071, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6561, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burdeau-ca9-1999.