United States v. Harris

165 F.3d 1277, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1213, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 958, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1492, 1999 WL 46988
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 4, 1999·No. Nos. 97-10418, 96-10416·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Order; Dissent by

Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny appellants’ petition for rehearing and Judge Schroeder has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judges Wiggins and Noonan recommend rejection of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en bane. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en bane consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Harris, 165 F.3d 1277, 99 Daily Journal DAR 1213, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 958, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1492, 1999 WL 46988 (9th Cir. 1999).

165 F.3d 1277 (United States v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related