Smith v. State
532 S.W.3d 705
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 182 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jeffrey Smith appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 532 S.W.3d 705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
532 S.W.3d 705 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.