Smith v. State
476 S.W.3d 308, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1173, 2015 WL 7253047
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1362 →
Opinion
ORDER
Keith Smith appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 476 S.W.3d 308, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1173, 2015 WL 7253047 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).
476 S.W.3d 308 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.