Smith v. State
413 S.W.3d 388, 2013 WL 5988953, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1125 →
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Julius Smith, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 413 S.W.3d 388, 2013 WL 5988953, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
413 S.W.3d 388 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.