Smith v. State
348 S.W.3d 120, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1187, 2011 WL 4036535
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1773 →
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Andre Smith, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 348 S.W.3d 120, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1187, 2011 WL 4036535 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
348 S.W.3d 120 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grace v. St. Louis County
348 S.W.3d 120 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)