Smith v. State

293 S.W.3d 122, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2009 WL 2948738
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1829
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 91618·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry B. Smith appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 293 S.W.3d 122, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2009 WL 2948738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

293 S.W.3d 122 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.