Smith v. State

284 S.W.3d 597, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1611, 2008 WL 5456253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1829
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2008·No. ED 91155·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John H. Smith appeals the Circuit Court of St. Louis County’s judgment dismissing his petition for return of property. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court correctly found that Smith’s claim was barred under the doctrine of res jiidicata. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 284 S.W.3d 597, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1611, 2008 WL 5456253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

284 S.W.3d 597 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stein v. Novus Equities Co.
284 S.W.3d 597 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)