Smith v. State
293 S.W.3d 484, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417, 2009 WL 3170466
Opinion
ORDER
Anthony Smith appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Smith claims that he was entitled to have the Rule 29.15 proceedings reopened because he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 293 S.W.3d 484, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417, 2009 WL 3170466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
293 S.W.3d 484 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Livingston
293 S.W.3d 484 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)