State v. Livingston

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Livingston

299 S.W.3d 336, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1808, 2009 WL 4927432

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 2009·No. ED 92705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Berry Livingston (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for stealing over $500. He waived jury sentencing in exchange for the State not pursuing allegations of his being a prior and persistent offender. Defendant was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Berry Livingston (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for stealing over $500. He waived jury sentencing in exchange for the State not pursuing allegations of his being a prior and persistent offender. Defendant was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Livingston, 299 S.W.3d 336, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1808, 2009 WL 4927432 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

299 S.W.3d 336 (State v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related