State v. Conner

299 S.W.3d 336, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1803, 2009 WL 4927433
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 2009·No. ED 92514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*337 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, James Conner, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of second-degree trafficking of cocaine base, in violation of section 195.223 RSMo. (Supp. 2007), and one count of misdemeanor marijuana possession, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Conner, 299 S.W.3d 336, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1803, 2009 WL 4927433 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

299 S.W.3d 336 (State v. Conner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Livingston
299 S.W.3d 336 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)