State v. Conner
This text of 299 S.W.3d 336 (State v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*337 ORDER
The defendant, James Conner, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of second-degree trafficking of cocaine base, in violation of section 195.223 RSMo. (Supp. 2007), and one count of misdemeanor marijuana possession, in violation of section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 S.W.3d 336, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1803, 2009 WL 4927433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conner-moctapp-2009.