Smith v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Ronald Smith (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judgment) denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, *932 provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
332 S.W.3d 931 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.