Salamone v. Director of Revenue

332 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 303, 2011 WL 794775
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2011·No. ED 94636·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darren J. Salamone (hereinafter, “Driver”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the suspension of his driving privileges by the Director of Revenue (hereinafter, “the Director”). Driver argues there was no competent, credible evidence presented at trial demonstrating he was driving a motor vehicle for use on a Missouri highway.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salamone v. Director of Revenue, 332 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 303, 2011 WL 794775 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

332 S.W.3d 931 (Salamone v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
332 S.W.3d 931 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)