Smith v. State

352 S.W.3d 676, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1540, 2011 WL 5553024
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1773
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 2011·No. ED 95065·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Smith (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 352 S.W.3d 676, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1540, 2011 WL 5553024 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

352 S.W.3d 676 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.