Smith v. State

443 S.W.3d 48, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1049, 2014 WL 4702612
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1342
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2014·No. No. ED 100353·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Smith appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girar-deau County denying, without an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 443 S.W.3d 48, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1049, 2014 WL 4702612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

443 S.W.3d 48 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.