Smith v. State

381 S.W.3d 395, 2012 WL 4883189, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1125
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97486·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paula Smith (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 381 S.W.3d 395, 2012 WL 4883189, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 395 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.