Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Smith v. State

426 S.W.3d 23, 2014 WL 1302022, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 356

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1125 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2014·No. No. ED 99640·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin Smith appeals from the motion court’s judgment, without an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin Smith appeals from the motion court’s judgment, without an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Smith v. State, 426 S.W.3d 23, 2014 WL 1302022, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 356 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

426 S.W.3d 23 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.