Smith v. State
456 S.W.3d 875, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1478, 2014 WL 7403858
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 307 →
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Brandon R. Smith appeals the judgment denying a Rule 29.15 post-convictión motion. Mr. Smith claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call mitigation witnesses at the sentencing hearing and for failing to give advice to accept the State’s plea offer.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 456 S.W.3d 875, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1478, 2014 WL 7403858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).
456 S.W.3d 875 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.