Smith v. State
504 S.W.3d 101, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 795, 2016 WL 4437982
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1362 →
Opinion
ORDER
James Antonio Smith appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 504 S.W.3d 101, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 795, 2016 WL 4437982 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
504 S.W.3d 101 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.