Smith v. State
519 S.W.3d 464, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 131, 2017 WL 895926
This text of 519 S.W.3d 464 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. State, 519 S.W.3d 464, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 131, 2017 WL 895926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
ORDER
Robert K. Smith appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
519 S.W.3d 464, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 131, 2017 WL 895926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-moctapp-2017.