Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Moore v. State

Moore v. State

196 S.W.3d 67, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2006 WL 1736578
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 27, 2006
DocketNo. ED 86785
StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.W.3d 67 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 196 S.W.3d 67, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2006 WL 1736578 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deandre Moore (“Movant”)1 appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. Helmig v. State, 42 S.W.3d 658, 665-66 (Mo.App.E.D.2001). An extended would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helmig v. State
42 S.W.3d 658 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 S.W.3d 67, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2006 WL 1736578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-moctapp-2006.