SCHROEDER v. McDONALD

50 F.3d 788, 95 Daily Journal DAR 3835, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2223, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6108
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 1995
Docket93-15169
StatusPublished

This text of 50 F.3d 788 (SCHROEDER v. McDONALD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SCHROEDER v. McDONALD, 50 F.3d 788, 95 Daily Journal DAR 3835, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2223, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6108 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

50 F.3d 788

Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Pete McDONALD, Branch Administrator; Susan Segawa, Social
Worker; Ron Mico, Social Worker; George W.
Sumner, DPS Director; Roland Leong,
Prison Guard, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 93-15169.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 27, 1995.

Before: POOLE, WIGGINS and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

The petition for rehearing is granted. The opinion filed at 41 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir.1994) is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schroeder v. McDonald
50 F.3d 788 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 F.3d 788, 95 Daily Journal DAR 3835, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2223, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schroeder-v-mcdonald-ca9-1995.