Home/Fifth Circuit/Reed v. City of Arlington

Reed v. City of Arlington

634 F.3d 769, 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 27, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3593, 2011 WL 651889
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2011
Docket08-11098
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 634 F.3d 769 (Reed v. City of Arlington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed v. City of Arlington, 634 F.3d 769, 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 27, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3593, 2011 WL 651889 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coble v. DeRosia
823 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (E.D. California, 2011)
Reed v. City of Arlington
650 F.3d 571 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 F.3d 769, 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 27, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3593, 2011 WL 651889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reed-v-city-of-arlington-ca5-2011.