People v. Figueroa
This text of 269 A.D.2d 204 (People v. Figueroa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered February 11, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglars’ [205]*205tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of SVs to 7 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly declined to charge criminal trespass in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary. We find no reasonable view of the evidence that would permit the jury to find that defendant committed criminal trespass but not burglary (see, People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364). The Sandoval ruling was an appropriate exercise of discretion (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D.2d 204, 703 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-figueroa-nyappdiv-2000.