People v. Figueroa

269 A.D.2d 204, 703 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Figueroa. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 A.D.2d 561

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered February 11, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglars’ [205]*205tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of SVs to 7 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge criminal trespass in the third degree as a lesser included offense of burglary. We find no reasonable view of the evidence that would permit the jury to find that defendant committed criminal trespass but not burglary (see, People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364). The Sandoval ruling was an appropriate exercise of discretion (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Figueroa, 269 A.D.2d 204, 703 N.Y.S.2d 714, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 204 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Scarborough
402 N.E.2d 1127 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)