People v. Figueroa

283 A.D.2d 943, 725 N.Y.S.2d 254, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4571
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, he voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763), and that waiver encompasses his contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). Defendant’s further contention that the restitution order must be vacated because restitution was not a part of the plea agreement is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and in any event is lacking in merit (see, People v Parsons, 210 AD2d 901, lv denied 85 NY2d 941). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Pietruszka, J. — Attempted Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Figueroa, 283 A.D.2d 943, 725 N.Y.S.2d 254, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 943 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Logan
2 A.D.3d 1392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)