People v. Figueroa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Figueroa

294 A.D.2d 514, 742 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5244

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Figueroa. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 A.D.2d 561 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 2002·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered February 14, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[515]*515Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Florio, J.P., Smith, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered February 14, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[515]*515Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Florio, J.P., Smith, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

People v. Figueroa, 294 A.D.2d 514, 742 N.Y.S.2d 561, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

294 A.D.2d 514 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related