People v. West
This text of 281 A.D.2d 647 (People v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered March 16, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant raised a Batson challenge (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79) during jury selection. Since the defendant did not address the merits of the prosecution’s facially-neutral explanations his contention that the explanations, were pretextual is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Figueroa, 276 AD2d 561; People v Santiago, 272 AD2d 418).
The trial court properly exercised its discretion in admitting the videotape of the drug transaction into evidence (see, People v Williams, 208 AD2d 662; People v Morgan, 175 AD2d 930; People v Papa, 168 AD2d 692).
The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D.2d 647, 722 N.Y.S.2d 396, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-west-nyappdiv-2001.