Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
This text of 198 F. 783 (Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are informed that the receivers of the -New York City Railway Company and of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company have united in paying for the printing and certification of the records in these cases, each party paying one-half. In view of this fact, we are of the opinion that no costs should be awarded in this court. If, however, any of the successful parties desire to submit special reasons why costs should be awarded to them, they may present their views in a brief printed memorandum within 10 days after the date of filing our opinions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 F. 783, 117 C.C.A. 565, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pennsylvania-steel-co-v-new-york-city-ry-co-ca2-1912.