Moscatiello v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Moscatiello v. Hilliard

919 A.2d 186, 591 Pa. 402, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 568

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 13, 2007

Docket544 WAL 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 919 A.2d 186 (Moscatiello v. Hilliard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moscatiello v. Hilliard, 919 A.2d 186, 591 Pa. 402, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 568 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

*403 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Does the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA’s) procedural provision which allows for a three-month time frame within which to challenge an arbitration award preempt the state procedural rule which sets the time limit at thirty days? If not, should Pennsylvania courts apply the state or federal procedures?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*403 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Does the Federal Arbitration Act’s (FAA’s) procedural provision which allows for a three-month time frame within which to challenge an arbitration award preempt the state procedural rule which sets the time limit at thirty days? If not, should Pennsylvania courts apply the state or federal procedures?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

919 A.2d 186, 591 Pa. 402, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moscatiello-v-hilliard-pa-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack