FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Federal question
28 U.S.C. § 1331
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (Federal question) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
438 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11
393 U.S. 233 (Supreme Court, 1969)
State of New York Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Wells Fargo National Bank, N.A.
824 F.3d 308 (Second Circuit, 2016)
Hill v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
946 F. Supp. 2d 817 (N.D. Illinois, 2013)
Wamai v. Republic of Sudan
174 F. Supp. 3d 242 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Gray Financial Group, Inc. v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
825 F.3d 1236 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest, Inc. v. National Park Service
112 F.3d 1283 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Gerard Piscopo v. Public Service Electric and Ga
650 F. App'x 106 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Flora v. Hamilton
81 F.R.D. 576 (M.D. North Carolina, 1978)
Becknell v. Severance Pay Plan of Johnson & Johnson
644 F. App'x 205 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Smith v. Meyers
843 F. Supp. 2d 499 (D. Delaware, 2012)
Uptown Grill, L.L.C. v. Michael Shwartz, et
817 F.3d 251 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Robert Skinner v. Jeffrey Gragg
650 F. App'x 214 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Atchison v. U.S. District Courts
190 F. Supp. 3d 78 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Popkin v. Burwell
172 F. Supp. 3d 161 (District of Columbia, 2016)
John Duda v. Standard Insurance Co
649 F. App'x 230 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Nihal Menekse v. Harrahs Chester Casino & Racet
649 F. App'x 142 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Barry Boles v. WalMart Stores Inc
650 F. App'x 125 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Michael Cook v. City of Philadelphia
649 F. App'x 174 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Orologio of Short Hills Inc. v. Swatch Group (U.S.) Inc.
653 F. App'x 134 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 85–554, §1, July 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 415; Pub. L. 94–574, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2721; Pub. L. 96–486, §2(a), Dec. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 2369.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1, 36 Stat. 1091; May 14, 1934, ch. 283, §1, 48 Stat. 775; Aug. 21, 1937, ch. 726, §1, 50 Stat. 738; Apr. 20, 1940, ch. 117, 54 Stat. 143).
Jurisdiction of federal questions arising under other sections of this chapter is not dependent upon the amount in controversy. (See annotations under former section 41 of title 28, U.S.C.A., and 35 C.J.S., p. 833 et seq., §§30–43. See, also, reviser's note under section 1332 of this title.)
Words "wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs," were added to conform to rulings of the Supreme Court. See construction of provision relating to jurisdictional amount requirement in cases involving a Federal question in United States v. Sayward, 16 S.Ct. 371, 160 U.S. 493, 40 L.Ed. 508; Fishback v. Western Union Tel. Co., 16 S.Ct. 506, 161 U.S. 96, 40 L.Ed. 630; and Halt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co., 1900, 20 S.Ct. 272, 176 U.S. 68, 44 L.Ed. 374.
Words "all civil actions" were substituted for "all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity" to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "or treaties" were substituted for "or treaties made, or which shall be made under their authority," for purposes of brevity.
The remaining provisions of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 1332, 1341, 1342, 1345, 1354, and 1359 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–486 struck out "; amount in controversy; costs" in section catchline, struck out minimum amount in controversy requirement of $10,000 for original jurisdiction in federal question cases which necessitated striking the exception to such required minimum amount that authorized original jurisdiction in actions brought against the United States, any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof in an official capacity, struck out provision authorizing the district court except where express provision therefore was made in a federal statute to deny costs to a plaintiff and in fact impose such costs upon such plaintiff where plaintiff was adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the required amount in controversy, computed without regard to set-off or counterclaim and exclusive of interests and costs, and struck out existing subsection designations.
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–574 struck out $10,000 jurisdictional amount where action is brought against the United States, any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof in his official capacity.
1958—Pub. L. 85–554 included costs in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "$10,000" for "$3,000", and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment; Applicability
Pub. L. 96–486, §4, Dec. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 2370, provided: "This Act [amending this section and section 2072 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] shall apply to any civil action pending on the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 1, 1980]."
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Pub. L. 85–554, §3, July 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 415, provided that: "This Act [amending this section and sections 1332 and 1345 of this title] shall apply only in the case of actions commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 25, 1958]."
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1, 36 Stat. 1091; May 14, 1934, ch. 283, §1, 48 Stat. 775; Aug. 21, 1937, ch. 726, §1, 50 Stat. 738; Apr. 20, 1940, ch. 117, 54 Stat. 143).
Jurisdiction of federal questions arising under other sections of this chapter is not dependent upon the amount in controversy. (See annotations under former section 41 of title 28, U.S.C.A., and 35 C.J.S., p. 833 et seq., §§30–43. See, also, reviser's note under section 1332 of this title.)
Words "wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs," were added to conform to rulings of the Supreme Court. See construction of provision relating to jurisdictional amount requirement in cases involving a Federal question in United States v. Sayward, 16 S.Ct. 371, 160 U.S. 493, 40 L.Ed. 508; Fishback v. Western Union Tel. Co., 16 S.Ct. 506, 161 U.S. 96, 40 L.Ed. 630; and Halt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co., 1900, 20 S.Ct. 272, 176 U.S. 68, 44 L.Ed. 374.
Words "all civil actions" were substituted for "all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity" to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "or treaties" were substituted for "or treaties made, or which shall be made under their authority," for purposes of brevity.
The remaining provisions of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 1332, 1341, 1342, 1345, 1354, and 1359 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–486 struck out "; amount in controversy; costs" in section catchline, struck out minimum amount in controversy requirement of $10,000 for original jurisdiction in federal question cases which necessitated striking the exception to such required minimum amount that authorized original jurisdiction in actions brought against the United States, any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof in an official capacity, struck out provision authorizing the district court except where express provision therefore was made in a federal statute to deny costs to a plaintiff and in fact impose such costs upon such plaintiff where plaintiff was adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the required amount in controversy, computed without regard to set-off or counterclaim and exclusive of interests and costs, and struck out existing subsection designations.
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–574 struck out $10,000 jurisdictional amount where action is brought against the United States, any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof in his official capacity.
1958—Pub. L. 85–554 included costs in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "$10,000" for "$3,000", and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment; Applicability
Pub. L. 96–486, §4, Dec. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 2370, provided: "This Act [amending this section and section 2072 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] shall apply to any civil action pending on the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 1, 1980]."
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Pub. L. 85–554, §3, July 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 415, provided that: "This Act [amending this section and sections 1332 and 1345 of this title] shall apply only in the case of actions commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 25, 1958]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1331.