Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McCoy v. State

McCoy v. State

749 So. 2d 537, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 29, 2000 WL 3879
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 2000
DocketNo. 98-02219
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 749 So. 2d 537 (McCoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoy v. State, 749 So. 2d 537, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 29, 2000 WL 3879 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Chief Judge.

Recardo McCoy appeals from his conviction for possession of cocaine in case number CF97-05237A-XX and the revocation of his probation and the resulting sentence in case numbers CF94-1235A1-XX and CF94-2042A1-XX. We affirm in all respects, except that we must direct the trial court on remand to enter a written order specifying which probation conditions [538]*538McCoy violated. See Montonez v. State, 724 So.2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

PARKER and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doctor v. State
779 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
749 So. 2d 537, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 29, 2000 WL 3879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.