McCoy v. State

727 So. 2d 279, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1159, 1999 WL 68924
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCoy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 730 So. 2d 803
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1999·No. No. 97-00710·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Shane McCoy challenges the voluntariness of his no contest pleas in two cases. He has not filed a motion to withdraw his pleas, so we cannot address this issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979). We affirm without prejudice to his filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

McCoy also asserts that the court erred in imposing certain costs. He did not file a motion to correct this sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). He has, therefore, failed to preserve this issue for review. We will no longer correct unpreserved errors relating to costs. See Gaines v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D 2645, 724 So.2d 139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. State, 727 So. 2d 279, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1159, 1999 WL 68924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

727 So. 2d 279 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaines v. State
724 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Robinson v. State
373 So. 2d 898 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)