McCoy v. State
Opinion
Even though this case has been mooted as to the particular petitioner, we resolve the issue raised by his application for mandamus under the familiar exception to the mootness rule which permits appellate determination when the question presented “is capable of repetition yet evading review.” See 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 308 (1997). Upon that consideration, we hold, as both parties agree, that the failure of the judge who sets bail or other release conditions in an arrest warrant to cheek the appropriate box on the accompanying form that the bond may not be modified by the first appearance judge constitutes an affirmative authorization within the meaning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(d)(1)(D)1 for the first appearance judge to modify that bond. Stated otherwise, the Dade County first appearance judge has the authority and the duty independently to consider the appropriate conditions of release for a defendant arrested on a warrant issued by another judge so long as that judge does not specifically preclude him from doing so. To the extent that the petition seeks other relief, it is denied.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
702 So. 2d 252 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.