McCoy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCoy v. State

727 So. 2d 279, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1159, 1999 WL 68924

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 1999

DocketNo. 97-00710

StatusPublished

This text of 727 So. 2d 279 (McCoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCoy v. State, 727 So. 2d 279, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1159, 1999 WL 68924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Shane McCoy challenges the voluntariness of his no contest pleas in two cases. He has not filed a motion to withdraw his pleas, so we cannot address this issue on direct appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(iii); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979). We affirm without prejudice to his filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

McCoy also asserts that the court erred in imposing certain costs. He did not file a motion to correct this sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). He has, therefore, failed to preserve this issue for review. We will no longer correct unpreserved errors relating to costs. See Gaines v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D 2645, 724 So.2d 139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI