McCoy v. State

780 So. 2d 984, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4119, 2001 WL 277007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCoy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 So. 2d 455
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2001·No. No. 1D00-3144·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), was denied. Athough the trial court denied the claim because the appellant was sentenced to a negotiated term, the trial court failed to attach a copy of the plea agreement that would refute the appellant’s allegations. Because the appellant has alleged a facially sufficient claim under Heggs, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either grant the requested relief or to attach record portions conclusively showing the appellant is entitled to no relief.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. State, 780 So. 2d 984, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4119, 2001 WL 277007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

780 So. 2d 984 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)