Doctor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Doctor v. State

779 So. 2d 369, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5168, 2000 WL 554439

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 2000

DocketNo. 2D99-3163

StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 369 (Doctor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doctor v. State, 779 So. 2d 369, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5168, 2000 WL 554439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Ernie Doctor’s probation and the resulting sentence for one count of robbery and two counts of attempted robbery. We must remand, however, for the trial court to enter a written revocation order which specifies the conditions of probation that Doctor violated. See McCoy v. State, 749 So.2d 537 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed and remanded.

FULMER, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W„ (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Ernie Doctor’s probation and the resulting sentence for one count of robbery and two counts of attempted robbery. We must remand, however, for the trial court to enter a written revocation order which specifies the conditions of probation that Doctor violated. See McCoy v. State, 749 So.2d 537 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed and remanded.

FULMER, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W„ (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

779 So. 2d 369, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5168, 2000 WL 554439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doctor-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack