McCorry v. G. Cowser Construction, Inc.

644 N.E.2d 550, 1994 Ind. LEXIS 208, 1994 WL 703146
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 16, 1994
Docket45S05-9412-CV-1212
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 644 N.E.2d 550 (McCorry v. G. Cowser Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCorry v. G. Cowser Construction, Inc., 644 N.E.2d 550, 1994 Ind. LEXIS 208, 1994 WL 703146 (Ind. 1994).

Opinions

On Petition To Transfer

DICKSON, Justice.

The question presented is whether attorney fees are recoverable under Indiana Code Section 32-8-3-9, the personal lability seetion of the mechanic's lien statute. The Court of Appeals determined that such fees cannot be recovered. McCorry v. G. Cowser Const. Co., Inc. (1994), Ind.App., 636 N.E.2d 1273, 1279-80. One of the plaintiff-appellees, Snow-N'-Son, Inc., seeks transfer on grounds that the decision of the Court of Appeals conflicts with prior opinions of the Court of Appeals. See Gibson Lewis Corp. v. NIPSCO, (1988), Ind.App., 524 N.E.2d 1316, 1319 n. 4; Zeigler Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. Parkison, (1980), Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 1330, 1332; Indianapolis P & L Co. v. Southeastern Supply Co., (1970) 146 Ind.App. 554, 257 N.E.2d 722. Transfer is granted.

While a mechanic's lien must be filed within a specified period of time, there is no such time limitation in the personal responsibility statute, which makes no mention of a lien on real estate and does not separately provide for the recovery of attorney fees. McCorry, 636 N.E.2d 1273. The Court of Appeals held that a recovery based on the personal responsibility provisions of the mechanic's len statute does not constitute a len and therefore attorney fees are not available. Id.

We agree. To resolve the apparent conflict between the present and prior opinions of the Court of Appeals, we now expressly adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 11(B)B). The judgment of the trial court, as modified therein, is affirmed.

SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER and GIVAN, JJ., concur. SULLIVAN, J., concurs with separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas A. Ambrose II v. Dalton Construction, Inc.
51 N.E.3d 320 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2016)
Ritzert Co. v. United Fidelity Bank, FSB
935 N.E.2d 756 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2010)
National City Bank of Indiana v. All-Phase Electrical Supply Co.
790 N.E.2d 488 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2003)
Savoree v. Industrial Contracting & Erecting, Inc.
789 N.E.2d 1013 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2003)
Encore Construction Corp. v. SC Bodner Construction, Inc.
765 N.E.2d 223 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002)
SLR Plumbing & Sewer, Inc. v. Turk
757 N.E.2d 193 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Mercantile National Bank of Indiana v. First Builders of Indiana, Inc.
732 N.E.2d 1287 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Ford v. Culp Custom Homes, Inc.
731 N.E.2d 468 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Town & Country Homecenter of Crawfordsville, Indiana, Inc. v. Woods
725 N.E.2d 1006 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Riddle v. Newton Crane Service, Inc.
661 N.E.2d 6 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1996)
McCorry v. G. Cowser Construction, Inc.
644 N.E.2d 550 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 N.E.2d 550, 1994 Ind. LEXIS 208, 1994 WL 703146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccorry-v-g-cowser-construction-inc-ind-1994.