Martin v. State
832 So. 2d 943, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19158, 2002 WL 31870572
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 761 So. 2d 475 →
Opinion
Troy Martin appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, wherein defendant-appellant Martin asserts newly discovered evidence. The motion fails to set forth what the evidence was in the defendant’s case, and how the [944]*944claimed newly discovered evidence would have affected the outcome, if at all. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to file an amended motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 832 So. 2d 943, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19158, 2002 WL 31870572 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
832 So. 2d 943 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)