Martin v. State

761 So. 2d 1242, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8748, 2000 WL 953786
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 So. 2d 1173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2542·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Timothy Martin challenges his convictions and sentences for five offenses committed on August 9, 1996: two counts of DUI with serious bodily injury, two counts of DUI causing property damage, and driving with a suspended license. We affirm the convictions. However, the 1995 sentencing guidelines under which Martin was sentenced have been declared unconstitutional. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). Therefore, we remand for reconsideration of Martin’s sentences according to the procedure prescribed by Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed in part and remanded.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and GREEN, J„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 761 So. 2d 1242, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8748, 2000 WL 953786 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

761 So. 2d 1242 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)