Martin v. State
729 So. 2d 1010, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4665, 1999 WL 202035
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 So. 2d 1173 →
Opinion
The trial court summarily denied Martin’s 3.850 motion, but failed to attach any record evidence that conclusively refutes his allegations that he was improperly denied jail time credit. See Odum v. State, 700 So.2d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Brown v. State, 689 So.2d 1287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for attachment of record evidence [1011]*1011conclusively refuting his allegations or for an evidentiary hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 729 So. 2d 1010, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4665, 1999 WL 202035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
729 So. 2d 1010 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
689 So. 2d 1287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Odum v. State
700 So. 2d 388 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)